>>648202274Actually, you have to be the completely retarded one.
There is a literal American flag on the moon that you can pinpoint if you use a powerful enough telescope.
Furthermore, there are actual mirrors on the moon that you can point lasers at to reflect back at you.
We have real moon rocks brought back from the moon.
>>648203244The sun provides lighting to the earth, which is hundreds or even thousands of times brighter than any of the stars around it. This makes it nearly impossible to capture photos of stars unless it's at the right time, angle, and using a powerful camera.
If you don't believe any of the above, I advise you to go out and buy a laser pointer. Do some research about the mirrors on the moon, and figure out when and where you should point it.
If you aren't motivated enough to do this, you don't deserve to make the argument you, and other people, try to make.
Simple google searches from trusted websites will yield a plethora of information regarding the moon landing and how it was certainly not faked.
>>648203757According to you, Russia never called the US out on "faking the moon landing." Yes, indeed that is true. The reasoning for this is because they knew that it wasn't fake. It has been proven beyond a SHRED of reasonable doubt -- definitively -- that the moon landing is real.
The technology simple did not exist at the time to fake the moon landing in a studio or with doctored photos. The authorization by the FCC for commercial television to air did not take place until 1941(1), and regular television did not take place until 1942(1)
I believe that those who think it was easy to fake the moon landing in the time that it occurred are simply imbeciles. It saddens me that some people who are quite older who believe that the moon landing was faked. They even grew up in a time where special effects, video production, and visual effects were all new! The television had had barely 30 years from its initial
